Tom St John (University of Bristol) has published a paper on the use and limitations of derived chemical terms for assessing sulfur-species in ground materials. The author considers a wide range of derived chemical terms used in the literature, such as equivalent pyrite and total potential sulfate and the limitations involved in their application.
The paper is titled “Use of derived terms for sulfur-species in geological materials”.
“An assessment of the sulfur/sulfide content of ground materials for civil engineering purposes is essential in order to understand the potential for sulfate development. In the absence of detailed petrographic/mineralogical data, terms such as “total potential sulfate”, “oxidisable sulfides” and “equivalent pyrite” are often derived from sample test results for total sulfur, water-soluble sulfate and acid-soluble sulfate.